The Multiverse of Many Worlds

Exploring the Many Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

The ConscioCentric Paradigm subscribes to Everett's Relative State Formulation - This interpretation of the Schrodinger Equation and wave collapse is the most holistic explanation for the fundamental behavior of matter in the quantum realm.  In the ConscioCentric paradigm, promoting 4-Dimensional Spacetime into the 5th Dimension creates the canvas in which the "many worlds" implication becomes possible.   

Hugh Everett

Physicist, Quantum Foundations Pioneer

"The Many-World's Interpretation is the only completely coherent approach to explaining both the contents of quantum mechanics and the appearance of the world."

The term "multiverse" is sometimes used in cosmology discussions, with different meanings from physicists or consciousness researchers, but in the context of this site, the term is used synonymously with Hugh Everett's Relative State Formulation of Quantum Mechanics (aka: The Many Worlds Interpretation)

The 5th Dimension can be though of as the canvas for Freewill, or the will of the collective conscience of the universe.   The game of consciousness is to separate and reunify 3D matter through time, creating every more complex structures of control over matter, and extending spheres of conscious influence to large and larger sections of 4D space-time.   The 5th dimension is an infinite canvas of possible 4D timelines, however, in this game of consciousness that is played out, we consensually agree on a very solid idea of reality.   The "Moment of Now" is an extremely high probability snapshot of all matter in the universe, frozen in 4D time and 5D collective will/choice.   

Jason Cooper
Information Systems Engineer, Data Scientist, Consciocentric Creator

"Consciocentrism posits that the Many Worlds Interpretation (MWI) of quantum mechanics indicates another dimension perpendicular to the time dimension, which allows for the probabilistic nature of reality, plus branching and freewill -- and that consciousness exists in not just one of the many worlds at any given time, but in all of them -- the solid reality of the moment of now is a highly aligned, stacked composite image of the 5D manyverse of possibility."

Brian Greene
Physicist, Mathematician, String Theorist, Author

"Everett's approach, which he described as "objectively deterministic" with probability "reappearing at the subjective level," resonated with this strategy. And he was thrilled by the direction. As he noted in the 1956 draft of his dissertation, the framework offered to bridge the position of Einstein (who famously believed that a fundamental theory of physics should not involve probability) and the position of Bohr (who was perfectly happy with a fundamental theory that did). According to Everett, the Many Worlds approach accommodated both positions, the difference between them merely being one of perspective. Einstein's perspective is the mathematical one in which the grand probability wave of all particles relentlessly evolves by the Schrodinger equation, with chance playing absolutely no role. I like to picture Einstein soaring high above the many worlds of Many Worlds, watching as Schrodinger's equation fully dictates how the entire panorama unfolds, and happily concluding that even though quantum mechanics is correct, God doesn't play dice. Bohr's perspective is that of an inhabitant in one of the worlds, also happy, using probabilities to explain, with stupendous precision, those observations to which his limited perspective gives him access."